Although it doesn't always seem like it, the Windows Live Messenger team like to take care of their customers. Getting someone in at the weekend to remove a stupid message block and now explaining what went wrong.
Dharmesh Mehta, a lead on the Windows Live Messenger product management team who's emerging as something of a regular poster at MessengerSays (the official Windows Live Messenger team blog), has given an apology and some details of why YouTube was blocked for several hours last weekend.
The main things that worry me about what is said here are:
- one, how much of our messages are this third party seeing - there are severe privacy issues surrounding this, do the company only get sent URLs that appear in messages or all of our messages? how much control does Microsoft have over this? and why if "manually checking the URL" happens did someone still think to block YouTube.com?;
- and two, why does it take an uproar like this to get a website "unblocked" - while other legitimate websites are still blocked.
>> Post at "Inside Windows Live Messenger" blog (aka MessengerSays)
>> Send the Messenger team feedback
Dharmesh Mehta, a lead on the Windows Live Messenger product management team who's emerging as something of a regular poster at MessengerSays (the official Windows Live Messenger team blog), has given an apology and some details of why YouTube was blocked for several hours last weekend.
As some of you noticed, we had a problem from Friday night to Saturday morning where our Messenger service was incorrectly blocking some legitimate IP addresses. We sincerely apologize for any difficulties this caused our users. And we want to thank those of you that reported this problem to us so that we could quickly fix it. Because of your help, the incorrect block was only in place for a few hours.
As you can imagine, we are very serious about our efforts to block virus, malware and other harmful URLs from being passed on to our users. And we're continually working to improve this process so that we can keep our users safe without having a negative impact on your Messenger service.
There have been some pretty outlandish speculations on what happened so I'd like to give you some facts about our process for trying to block unsafe URLs and about what happened Friday night:
As always, we're open to feedback on how to make Messenger an even greater service. And again, our apologies to the users that were impacted by this.
As you can imagine, we are very serious about our efforts to block virus, malware and other harmful URLs from being passed on to our users. And we're continually working to improve this process so that we can keep our users safe without having a negative impact on your Messenger service.
There have been some pretty outlandish speculations on what happened so I'd like to give you some facts about our process for trying to block unsafe URLs and about what happened Friday night:
- There are a number of factors that can be used to determine whether a URL is potentially harmful: number of times a URL is sent, the frequency of the URL being sent, the number of accounts the URL is sent from, manually checking the URL, comparing with other "block lists", etc.
- When a URL is deemed harmful, a block can be instated for a specific URL (i.e. www.domain.com/page) or an entire domain (i.e. *.domain.com)
- This entire process for Messenger is managed by a 3rd party that is a Microsoft partner
- On Friday, Microsoft did not request to block any of the URLs that were accidentally blocked
The blocks were made by our partner as a result of their process to block harmful URLs - We are still investigating the specific reason our partner made these incorrect blocks and we will work with them to improve their process for detecting harmful URLs while not blocking safe ones
As always, we're open to feedback on how to make Messenger an even greater service. And again, our apologies to the users that were impacted by this.
The main things that worry me about what is said here are:
- one, how much of our messages are this third party seeing - there are severe privacy issues surrounding this, do the company only get sent URLs that appear in messages or all of our messages? how much control does Microsoft have over this? and why if "manually checking the URL" happens did someone still think to block YouTube.com?;
- and two, why does it take an uproar like this to get a website "unblocked" - while other legitimate websites are still blocked.
>> Post at "Inside Windows Live Messenger" blog (aka MessengerSays)
>> Send the Messenger team feedback
Did you like this news post?
You can get all the latest articles at msgstuff.com in your email inbox each morning by entering your email address below.
Your address will only be used for mailing you the articles, and each one will include a link so you can unsubscribe at any time.
If you have an RSS reader, I recommend you subscribe to the Full RSS Feed

Comments:
Add Comment: